A STUDY OF APPROACHES TO DATA PROCESSING AND FACTORIZATION IN GEOINFORMATION SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5371.2026.1.5Keywords:
algebraic data factorization, geographic information systems, spatiotemporal data, system analysis, matrix factorization, comparative analysisAbstract
Purpose. To conduct a comparative analysis of existing approaches to geospatial data processing in geographic information systems and to determine the potential for applying algebraic factorization to the analysis of multidimensional environmental data.
Methodology. A systematization and comparative analysis of approaches to geospatial data processing was performed, specifically including methods of distributed computing, geometric modeling, matrix factorization, multidimensional statistical analysis, spatio-temporal graph neural networks, and approaches to integrating data from various sources. The evaluation was based on the following criteria: data type, presence of a spatial component, consideration of temporal dependencies, application of algebraic factorization, integration with GIS, scalability, interpretability of results, computational complexity, and suitability for environmental tasks. Four groups of approaches were considered: infrastructural and theoretical methods, algebraic factorization methods, statistical methods, and intelligent algorithms, which allowed for an assessment of their effectiveness in processing spatial, spatiotemporal, and multidimensional geospatial data.
Findings. It has been established that neural network models effectively account for complex spatiotemporal dependencies but are characterized by high computational complexity and low interpretability. It is shown that existing approaches do not provide a universal combination of methods of algebraic factorization, spatiotemporal modeling, and the specifics of environmental geospatial data.
Originality. Modern approaches to geospatial data processing have been systematized from the perspective of applying algebraic factorization, and unresolved aspects of its integration into environmental geoinformation systems have been identified. The feasibility of developing factorization methods for multidimensional data that account for spatiotemporal dependencies has been substantiated.
Practical value. The results can be used to create new methods of algebraic factorization in environmental geoinformation systems, in particular for environmental monitoring, decision support, and the analysis of multidimensional geospatial data.
Downloads
References
Hawick K. A., Coddington P. D., James H. A. Distributed frameworks and parallel algorithms for processing large-scale geographic data. Parallel Computing. 2003. Vol. 29, No. 10. P. 1297–1333.
Frank A. U. Practical geometry-mathematics for geographic information systems. Script for GIS Theory course at TU Wien. Vienna: TU Wien, 2007.
Lian D., Zhao C., Xie X., Sun G., Chen E., Rui Y. GeoMF: joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2014. P. 831–840.
Li X., Cong G., Li X. L., Pham T. A. N., Krishnaswamy S. Rank-GeoFM: a ranking based geographical factorization method for point of interest recommendation. Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2015. P. 433–442.
Rahmani H. A., Aliannejadi M., Ahmadian S., Baratchi M., Afsharchi M., Crestani F. LGLMF: local geographical based logistic matrix factorization model for POI recommendation. Asia Information Retrieval Symposium. Cham: Springer, 2019. P. 66–78.
Rahmani H. A., Aliannejadi M., Baratchi M., Crestani F. Joint geographical and temporal modeling based on matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation. European Conference on Information Retrieval. Cham: Springer, 2020. P. 205–219.
Huang K., Luo X., Zheng Z. Application of a combined approach including contamination indexes, geographic information system and multivariate statistical models in levels, distribution and sources study of metals in soils in Northern China. PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13, No. 2. Article e0190906.
Titeux N., Dufrêne M., Jacob J. P., Paquay M., Defourny P. Multivariate analysis of a fine-scale breeding bird atlas using a geographical information system and partial canonical correspondence analysis: environmental and spatial effects. Journal of Biogeography. 2004. Vol. 31, No. 11. P. 1841–1856.
Wang P., Zhang T., Zheng Y., Hu T. A multi-view bidirectional spatiotemporal graph network for urban traffic flow imputation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2022. Vol. 36, No. 6. P. 1231–1257.
Wu H., Li Y., Lin A., Fan H., Fan K., Xie J., Luo W. A review of crowdsourced geographic information for land-use and land-cover mapping: current progress and challenges. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2024. Vol. 38, No. 11. P. 2183–2215.
Han M. Tourism geographic information visualization and recommendation system integrating multi-source data with intelligent algorithms. 2025 2nd International Conference on Software, Systems and Information Technology (SSITCON). IEEE, 2025. P. 1–5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Антоніна ВОЛІВАЧ, Ростислав ВЛАСОВ

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.