Procedure for withdrawing articles

The journal maintains the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record by timely corrections, notifications of concerns, and retractions of publications where necessary.

The editorial board acts in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

  1. General Provisions

If errors, inaccuracies, or violations of academic integrity are identified in submitted or already published materials, the editorial board takes appropriate measures depending on the nature and seriousness of the issue.

The purpose of these measures is to ensure the reliability of scientific information, not to punish authors.

  1. Corrections

If errors are identified in a published article that do not significantly affect the results or conclusions of the research, the editorial board may publish a correction (correction, erratum, or corrigendum).

Corrections may be issued in cases of:

  • technical or editorial errors;
  • inaccuracies in data that do not alter the substantive conclusions;
  • errors in references, names, affiliations, etc.

A correction:

  • is published separately or as a supplement to the article;
  • is linked to the original publication;
  • contains a clear explanation of the changes made.
  1. Expressions of Concern

In cases where there are reasonable suspicions regarding the reliability or ethical integrity of a publication, but the investigation is still ongoing, the editorial board may publish an expression of concern. Such a notice informs readers about potential issues with the material pending the completion of the investigation.

  1. Retraction of Publications

An article may be retracted if significant violations are identified that render its results unreliable or ethically unacceptable.

Grounds for retraction may include:

  • plagiarism or self-plagiarism;
  • fabrication or falsification of data;
  • duplicate publication;
  • serious methodological errors affecting the conclusions;
  • violations of research ethics;
  • manipulation of the peer-review process.

The decision to retract an article is made by the editorial board after conducting an investigation and, where necessary, consulting experts or relevant institutions.

A retracted article:

  • is not removed from the website;
  • is clearly marked as retracted;
  • is accompanied by a notice explaining the reasons for retraction.
  1. Initiation of Corrections or Retractions

The correction or retraction procedure may be initiated by:

  • authors;
  • the editorial board;
  • reviewers;
  • readers or other interested parties.

All requests are considered in accordance with the journal’s complaints and appeals policy.

  1. Principles of Decision-Making

All decisions regarding corrections and retractions are made based on the principles of:

  • objectivity and impartiality;
  • transparency;
  • compliance with COPE recommendations;
  • ensuring the reliability of scientific information.

The editorial board ensures proper notification of read.