INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

Authors

  • Kostiantyn S. Olefirenko Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5398.2026.1.7

Keywords:

sustainable development, strategic management, methodology, information, non-financial reporting, stages of analysis

Abstract

The article examines the regulatory framework that regulates the processes of compiling non-financial reporting at the international and national levels, and also summarizes methodological approaches for processing indicators that characterize the sustainable development of an enterprise. It is noted that the main requirements for compiling sustainable development reporting are defined by the standards of the Global Reporting Initiative, the International Financial Reporting Standards for Sustainable Development, and the European Reporting Standards in the field of sustainable development. These standards regulate the content of non-financial reporting, but generally do not have unified requirements. For Ukrainian enterprises, the most important are the European Reporting Standards, which determine the structure of information important for the analysis of the sustainable development of an enterprise. Such important elements as components of analysis (economic, environmental, social, managerial, others) are highlighted. Among other things, the importance of focusing on management in the field of sustainable development, strategies, risks, and metrics is emphasized. A generalized structural-logical model of forming information and analytical information for the strategic management of sustainable development of enterprises is presented. The main methodological approaches to the analysis of sustainable development were also systematized. In addition to the traditional economic, environmental, social and managerial components, scientists distinguish a number of others, organizational, technological, risky. Based on the generalization of current approaches, the article formulated the goal, objectives and stages of the analysis of the sustainable development of the enterprise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Smachylo, I. I. (2013). Klasternyi analiz pokaznykiv staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstv [Cluster analysis of indicators of the enterprise sustainable development]. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2 (2 (10), 36–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2013.12969 [in Ukrainian].

Pislaru, M., Herghiligiu, I. V., & Robu, I. B. (2019). Corporate sustainable performance assessment based on fuzzy logic. Journal of Cleaner Production, (223), 998–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.03.130.

Herghiligiu, I. V., Robu, I.-B., Vîlcu, A., & Pîslaru, M. (2021). Organizational sustainability main components identification using PCA. The 7th International Symposium TTPF 2021 (pp. 256–262), Iasi, Romania, Sciendo. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358509143_Organizational_Sustainability_Main_Components_Identification_Using_PCA.

Lahodiienko, O. V., Rudenko, S. V., & Lahodiienko, N. V. (2024). Otsinka vidpovidnosti pidpryiemstv kryteriiam ESG: osnovni vyklyky [Assessing the compliance of enterprises with ESG criteria: main challenges]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (66). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-26 [in Ukrainian].

Hendiani, S., Liao, Y., Bagherpour, M., Tvaronavi, M., Banaitis, A., & Antucheviciene, J. (2020). Analyzing the Status of Sustainable Development in the Manufacturing Sector Using Multi-Expert Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Decision-Making and Integrated Triple Bottom Lines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113800.

Filipishyna, L. M. (2017). Intehralna otsinka stiikosti rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv [Integral assessment of the sustainability of industrial enterprises]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky – Global and national economic problems, (19), 280–285 [in Ukrainian].

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). URL: https://www.globalreporting.org/

The GRI Standards. URL: https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/

International Sustainability Standards Board. URL: https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-sustainability-standards-board/

Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/34/oj/eng.

Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj/eng.

Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj/ eng.

KPMG (2023). Get ready for European Sustainability Reporting Standards Understanding the first set of ESRSs. 24 p. URL: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/ie/pdf/2023/08/ie-european-sustainability-reporting-standards-esrs.pdf.

MSCI ESG Research LLC. URL: https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/1311232/ESG+ADV+2A+2017-03.pdf/49ba55aa-b739-428c-b32d-87580eb4aeea.

Morningstar Sustainalytics. URL: https://www.sustainalytics.com/about-us#:~:text=For%20over%2030%20years%2C%20Morningstar,making%2C%20to%20monitoring%20and%20reporting.

S&P Global. URL: https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/be/pdf/Get-ready-for-ESRS-IFRS.pdf.

Proiekt Zakonu Ukrainy vid 21.08.2025 №13598-1 "Pro vnesennia zmin do Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro bukhhalterskyi oblik ta finansovu zvitnist v Ukraini" shchodo zvitnosti z staloho rozvytku [Draft Law of Ukraine dated 08/21/2025 No. 13598-1 "On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine "On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine" regarding sustainable development reporting]. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/JI13440A?an=2 [in Ukrainian].

Hilorme, T. V., & Shachanina, Yu. K. (2016). Korporatyvna sotsialna zvitnist yak dominanta informatsiinoho zabezpechennia upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Corporate social reporting as a dominant information support for enterprise management]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (2), 672–677. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/2_ukr/120.pdf [in Ukrainian].

United Nations (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. United Nations. New York. 99 p. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/guidelines.pdf.

Solodovnik, O., & Maidannyk, O. (2024). Pidkhody do otsinky suttievosti u zvitnosti pro stalyi rozvytok zghidno z mizhnarodnymy ta yevropeiskymy standartamy [Approaches to assessing materiality in sustainability reporting according to international and European standards]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (63). URL: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-63-83 [in Ukrainian].

Kravchenko, M. O., & Prudkyi, V. V. (2020). Model analizu staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstva z urakhuvanniam ryzyku [Model of analysis of sustainable development of an enterprise taking into account risk]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NTUU "KPI" – Economic Bulletin of NTUU "KPI", 1 (17), 291–305 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

Olefirenko, K. S. (2026). INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. Journal of Strategic Economic Research, (1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5398.2026.1.7

Issue

Section

MODERN TENDENCIES AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS